4.1 Article

Old frames and new lenses: Frames of reference revisited

Journal

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages 114-125

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0022185620983968

Keywords

Frames of reference; Marxism; pluralism; radical pluralism; unitarism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The concept of 'frames of reference' in industrial/employment relations, originally developed by Alan Fox, has remained a significant feature with limited scholarly research on its development. This special issue reviews existing literature to explore new and historical perspectives on frames, questioning the continued relevance of traditional frames in understanding employer and employee behavior amidst current changes in work and employment. Reflecting on Alan Fox's influence, the aim is to chart a forward-looking research agenda that builds upon his insights in adapting to the evolving field.
The 'frames of reference' concept has been a significant and enduring feature of industrial/employment relations since being developed by Alan Fox; and yet there has been only limited scholarly research seeking to develop the frames. We introduce this special issue by reviewing the extant literature on frames which provides a backdrop to the five article contributions that explore the frames in both new and historical light. The special issues ask the following questions: Do the traditional frames continue to provide insights into the perceptions and behaviour of employers and employees? If not, how might existing frames be broadened by new (or indeed historical) developments and insights? A re-examination of frames of reference is both important and timely given the many changes currently impacting work and employment. Our hope is that by reflecting on and celebrating the influence of Alan Fox on our thinking, we can also chart a forward-looking research agenda that continues to use his insights and apply them to the field as well as developing and continuing to engage with them.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available