4.7 Article

Validating a consumer-based service brand equity (CBSBE) model in the airline industry

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102354

Keywords

Service branding; Service brand equity; Service experience; Airline service; PLS-SEM; Structural model robustness

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scholars argue that consumer-based brand equity models are not suitable for service-dominant brands due to the neglect of customer experience with services. A new model called consumer-based service brand equity (CBSBE) is conceptualized and validated in the context of airlines to address this gap. Airline service experience and brand consistency are crucial for enhancing brand equity, with a focus on maximizing perceived value and creating favorable brand meaning being the core of branding services.
Over time, scholars have argued that consumer-based brand equity (CBBE) models are less suitable for service-dominant brands, mainly because the role of customer experience with services is often disregarded. Also, the absence of two essential components, brand consistency and perceived value, signals a lack of depth in creating service brand equity. To address these gaps, we examine service-branding theory by conceptualizing and validating a consumer-based service brand equity (CBSBE) model in Sarker et al. (2019) in the context of airlines. Airline service direct experience and brand consistency are highly important aspects for strengthening brand equity components of services. Subsequently, maximizing perceived value, followed by creating favorable brand meaning are the nucleus of branding services. Using the most advanced PLS-SEM techniques, our CBSBE model is highly robust in explaining the theoretical notion of creating service brand equity. Thus, achieving a pleasant and desirable experience and maintaining consistency across direct service touchpoints would be an effective strategy for service organizations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available