4.8 Article

Humidity-Dependent Thermal Boundary Conductance Controls Heat Transport of Super-Insulating Nanofibrillar Foams

Journal

MATTER
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2020.11.007

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish EnergyAgency (Energimyndigheten) [2019-006749]
  2. Formas [2015-2032]
  3. Wallenberg Wood Science Center (WWSC)
  4. Swedish Research Council [201605990]
  5. Swedish e-Research Centre (SeRC)
  6. Aforsk

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study highlights that in super-insulating nanocellulose foams, thinner fibrils result in lower thermal conductivity, which strongly depends on relative humidity. Controlling heat transport of hygroscopic super-insulating nanofibrillar foams through moisture uptake and release could have potential applications in packaging and building.
Cellulose nanomaterial (CNM)-based foams and aerogels with thermal conductivities substantially below the value for air attract significant interest as super-insulating materials in energy-efficient green buildings. However, the moisture dependence of the thermal conductivity of hygroscopic CNM-based materials is poorly understood, and the importance of phonon scattering in nanofibrillar foams remains unexplored. Here, we show that the thermal conductivity perpendicular to the aligned nanofibrils in super-insulating icetemplated nanocellulose foams is lower for thinner fibrils and depends strongly on relative humidity (RH), with the lowest thermal conductivity (14 mW m(-1) K-1) attained at 35% RH. Molecular simulations show that the thermal boundary conductance is reduced by the moisture-uptake-controlled increase of the fibril-fibril separation distance and increased by the replacement of air with water in the foam walls. Controlling the heat transport of hygroscopic super-insulating nanofibrillar foams by moisture uptake and release is of potential interest in packaging and building applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available