4.1 Article

A new ΔR value for the southern North Sea and its application in coastal research

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/njg.2020.19

Keywords

radiocarbon dating; marine reservoir effect; Wadden Sea; WASA; Mytilus edulis; Cerastoderma edule

Funding

  1. 'Niedersachsisches Vorab' of the VolkswagenStiftung within the funding initiative 'Kusten-und Meeresforschung in Niedersachsen' of the Ministry for Science and Culture of Lower Saxony, Germany [VW ZN3197]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AMS radiocarbon dating of shells near the island of Wangerooge in AD 1889 yielded a new local correction factor Delta R of -85 +/- 17 C-14 years for the Wadden Sea area. The study found that the incorporation of C-14-depleted terrestrial carbon into shell material contributes to the higher values, and highlighted the need for further research on bivalve shell preservation dynamics and the reintroduction of Mya arenaria into European waters.
Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon (C-14) dating of Cerastoderma edule (Linnaeus 1767) and Mytilus edulis (Linnaeus 1758) shells sampled in AD 1889 near the island of Wangerooge gave a new local correction factor Delta R of -85 +/- 17 C-14 years for the Wadden Sea area. The value is considerably higher than the available scattered data from the North Sea, which were obtained from pre-bomb growth rings of living Arctica islandica (Linnaeus 1767). This can be explained by the incorporation of C-14-depleted terrestrial carbon into the shell material which compensates the intensified exchange of CO2 between atmosphere and shallow coastal water, e.g. by tidal currents. Additionally, two examples of application of the new Delta R value in coastal research give deeper insights into the dynamics of bivalve shell preservation in the Wadden Sea and the need for further research to clarify the Holocene reintroduction of Mya arenaria (Linnaeus 1758) into European waters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available