4.4 Article

Comparison of Bayesian and Frequentist Multiplicity Correction for Testing Mutually Exclusive Hypotheses Under Data Dependence

Journal

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 111-128

Publisher

INT SOC BAYESIAN ANALYSIS
DOI: 10.1214/20-BA1196

Keywords

multiple hypothesis testing; multiplicity correction; false positive probability; Bayesian inference

Funding

  1. NSF [DMS-1007773, DMS-1407775]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The problem of testing mutually exclusive hypotheses with dependent test statistics is explored, with the Bayesian approach shown to have excellent frequentist properties, making it the most effective way to achieve frequentist multiplicity control in the presence of significant test statistic dependence.
The problem of testing mutually exclusive hypotheses with dependent test statistics is considered. Bayesian and frequentist approaches to multiplicity control are studied and compared to help gain understanding as to the effect of test statistic dependence on each approach. The Bayesian approach is shown to have excellent frequentist properties and is argued to be the most effective way of obtaining frequentist multiplicity control, without sacrificing power, when there is considerable test statistic dependence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available