Journal
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE
Volume 18, Issue 175, Pages -Publisher
ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0880
Keywords
morality; cooperation; altruism; honesty; mathematical modelling; utility function
Categories
Funding
- Slovenian Research Agency [P1-0403, J1-2457, J4-9302, J1-9112]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
One-shot anonymous unselfishness in economic games is commonly explained by social preferences, but recent research shows that it is better explained by preferences for following one's own personal norms. This moral preference hypothesis can be used to increase charitable donations by making the morality of an action salient.
One-shot anonymous unselfishness in economic games is commonly explained by social preferences, which assume that people care about the monetary pay-offs of others. However, during the last 10 years, research has shown that different types of unselfish behaviour, including cooperation, altruism, truth-telling, altruistic punishment and trustworthiness are in fact better explained by preferences for following one's own personal norms-internal standards about what is right or wrong in a given situation. Beyond better organizing various forms of unselfish behaviour, this moral preference hypothesis has recently also been used to increase charitable donations, simply by means of interventions that make the morality of an action salient. Here we review experimental and theoretical work dedicated to this rapidly growing field of research, and in doing so we outline mathematical foundations for moral preferences that can be used in future models to better understand selfless human actions and to adjust policies accordingly. These foundations can also be used by artificial intelligence to better navigate the complex landscape of human morality.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available