4.6 Article

Impacts of random filling on spin squeezing via Rydberg dressing in optical clocks

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.023106

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIST Precision Measurement Grants program
  2. Northwestern University Center for Fundamental Physics
  3. John Templeton Foundation
  4. Army Research Office [W911NF1910084]
  5. Packard Fellowship for Science and Engineering
  6. DoE BES Materials and Chemical Sciences Research for Quantum Information Science program [DE-SC0019449]
  7. Belgian American Educational Foundation
  8. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [W911NF1910084] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes spin squeezing via Rydberg dressing in optical lattice clocks with random fractional filling, comparing clock stability in different lattice geometries and providing practical tools for experimental implementation. The results demonstrate that spin squeezing in one-, two-, and three-dimensional optical lattices using Rydberg dressing can significantly improve stability in the presence of random fractional filling.
We analyze spin squeezing via Rydberg dressing in optical lattice clocks with random fractional filling. We compare the achievable clock stability in different lattice geometries, including unity-filled tweezer clock arrays and fractionally filled lattice clocks with varying dimensionality. We provide practical considerations and useful tools in the form of approximate analytical expressions and fitting functions to aid in the experimental implementation of Rydberg-dressed spin squeezing. We demonstrate that spin squeezing via Rydberg dressing in one-, two-, and three-dimensional optical lattices can provide significant improvements in stability in the presence of random fractional filling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available