4.8 Review

Research Progress and Future Perspectives on Rechargeable Na-O2 and Na-CO2 Batteries

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 158-177

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eem2.12139

Keywords

anode protection; cathode materials; electrolytes; Na-CO2 batteries; Na-O-2 batteries

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP180101453]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rechargeable sodium-oxygen and sodium-carbon dioxide batteries have the potential for high energy density and practical applications, but they are currently hindered by challenges such as low efficiency and limited cycle life. Understanding the working principles and reactions of electrodes is crucial for achieving their practical application, with a focus on mechanisms, anode protection, and electrolyte stability.
Rechargeable sodium-oxygen (Na-O-2) and sodium-carbon dioxide (Na-CO2) batteries have attracted intensive research attention in recent years owing to their advantages of high theoretical energy density, modest cost, abundance of sodium resources, and promising potential for achieving real sodium-air batteries in large-scale energy storage systems. Nevertheless, current research on Na-O-2 and Na-CO2 batteries is facing enormous challenges, such as low energy efficiency and limited cycle life, which are restricting their progress at the initial stage. Therefore, understanding their working principles, and the chemical and electrochemical reactions of the electrodes is indispensable to achieve their practical application and even the goal of true sodium-air batteries. This review aims to provide an overview of the research developments and future perspectives on Na-O-2 and Na-CO2 batteries, which include the major aspects, such as working mechanisms, air cathode materials design strategies, sodium anode protection, and electrolyte stability. Moreover, the remaining issues and future research directions are also thoroughly discussed and presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available