Journal
INTELLIGENCE
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2020.101504
Keywords
Tech tilt; Ability tilt; Spearman's Law of Diminishing Returns; General intelligence (g); Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery; Science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)
Categories
Funding
- National Science Foundation's Interdisciplinary Behavioral and Social Science Research Competition [IBSS-L 1620457]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study examined tilt in technical and academic abilities for Whites and Blacks and its relationship with college tests. There were differences in the relationship between tech tilt and college tests for Whites and Blacks, with tech tilt being more predictive of STEM criteria for Whites.
Tilt refers to an ability bias and is based on within subject differences between two abilities, indicating strength in one ability (e.g., math) and weakness in another ability (e.g., verbal). The current study examined tech tilt for Whites and Blacks, two groups with an average ability difference (favoring Whites) of about one standard deviation on tests of general intelligence (g). Tech tilt was based on differences in technical (mechanical, electronic) and academic (math or verbal) abilities on the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. These differences produced tech tilt (tech > academic) and academic tilt (academic > tech). Tech tilt correlated negatively with math and verbal abilities on college tests (SAT, ACT, PSAT), with weaker effects for Whites. White-Black differences in relations of tech tilt with the college tests were neutralized after removing g. In addition, tech tilt predicted jobs and college majors in STEM (science, technology, engineering, math). Relations of tech tilt with STEM criteria were generally larger (and more often significant) for Whites, but only for tech tilt based on technical and verbal abilities. The results are consistent with Spearman's Law of Diminishing Returns (SLODR). SLODR assumes that relations among tests should be weaker for higher ability groups (Whites compared to Blacks) and that non-g variance (related to non-ability factors such as vocational choice) should be more pronounced for higher ability groups. The negative relations of tech tilt with college tests support investment theories, which assume that investment in one ability (technical) comes at the expense of competing abilities (academic).
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available