3.8 Article

Nonparametric estimation of population average dose-response curves using entropy balancing weights for continuous exposures

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10742-020-00236-2

Keywords

Causal inference; Weighted estimation; Local linear regression; Mental health; Substance abuse

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health [R01DA045049]
  2. National Institute on Aging [R21AG058123]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Weighted estimators are commonly used to estimate exposure effects in observational settings. Recent developments in optimization-based estimators such as entropy balancing show promise in estimating treatment effects. This paper explores methods for continuous exposure settings and population dose-response curves estimation using entropy balancing weights.
Weighted estimators are commonly used for estimating exposure effects in observational settings to establish causal relations. These estimators have a long history of development when the exposure of interest is binary and where the weights are typically functions of an estimated propensity score. Recent developments in optimization-based estimators for constructing weights in binary exposure settings, such as those based on entropy balancing, have shown more promise in estimating treatment effects than those methods that focus on the direct estimation of the propensity score using likelihood-based methods. This paper explores recent developments of entropy balancing methods to continuous exposure settings and the estimation of population dose-response curves using nonparametric estimation combined with entropy balancing weights, focusing on factors that would be important to applied researchers in medical or health services research. The methods developed here are applied to data from a study assessing the effect of non-randomized components of an evidence-based substance use treatment program on emotional and substance use clinical outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available