4.5 Article

Comparative validation of the BOADICEA and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk models incorporating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in a population-based prospective cohort of women of European ancestry

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13058-021-01399-7

Keywords

Absolute risk; BOADICEA; Breast cancer; IBIS; Model validation; Prospective cohort; Risk prediction; Tyrer-Cuzick

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK [C12292/A20861, C1287/A16563]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [633784]
  3. National Health Service
  4. Breast Cancer Now
  5. Intramural Research Program, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services
  6. University of North Carolina LCCC Cancer Control Education Program predoctoral training grant from the National Cancer Institute [T32-CA057726]
  7. Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Award [ME1602-34530]
  8. Institute of Cancer Research
  9. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [633784] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The extended BOADICEA model accurately identified women at elevated breast cancer risk compared to the Tyrer-Cuzick model with PRS, showing improved discrimination in younger women and substantially in older women. Incorporating reproductive/lifestyle factors and PRS into risk models can inform risk stratified breast cancer prevention strategies among women of European ancestry.
Background The Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) and the Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk prediction models are commonly used in clinical practice and have recently been extended to include polygenic risk scores (PRS). In addition, BOADICEA has also been extended to include reproductive and lifestyle factors, which were already part of Tyrer-Cuzick model. We conducted a comparative prospective validation of these models after incorporating the recently developed 313-variant PRS. Methods Calibration and discrimination of 5-year absolute risk was assessed in a nested case-control sample of 1337 women of European ancestry (619 incident breast cancer cases) aged 23-75 years from the Generations Study. Results The extended BOADICEA model with reproductive/lifestyle factors and PRS was well calibrated across risk deciles; expected-to-observed ratio (E/O) at the highest risk decile :0.97 (95 % CI 0.51 - 1.86) for women younger than 50 years and 1.09 (0.66 - 1.80) for women 50 years or older. Adding reproductive/lifestyle factors and PRS to the BOADICEA model improved discrimination modestly in younger women (area under the curve (AUC) 69.7 % vs. 69.1%) and substantially in older women (AUC 64.6 % vs. 56.8%). The Tyrer-Cuzick model with PRS showed evidence of overestimation at the highest risk decile: E/O = 1.54(0.81 - 2.92) for younger and 1.73 (1.03 - 2.90) for older women. Conclusion The extended BOADICEA model identified women in a European-ancestry population at elevated breast cancer risk more accurately than the Tyrer-Cuzick model with PRS. With the increasing availability of PRS, these analyses can inform choice of risk models incorporating PRS for risk stratified breast cancer prevention among women of European ancestry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available