4.1 Review

Evolution of β-lactamases and enzyme promiscuity

Journal

PROTEIN ENGINEERING DESIGN & SELECTION
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzab013

Keywords

beta-lactamase; enzyme promiscuity; evolution; promiscuous activity

Funding

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) Foundation [FDN-148437]
  2. Norwegian PhD School of Pharmacy
  3. National Graduate School in Infection Biology and Antimicrobials
  4. National Graduate School in Biocatalysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Beta-lactamases are a common resistance mechanism against beta-lactam antibiotics and have become important models in enzymology and evolutionary biochemistry. They have evolved multiple times from distinct evolutionary origins, exhibiting diverse structural features and enzymatic mechanisms. Understanding their evolution and diversity can aid various disciplines.
beta-Lactamases represent one of the most prevalent resistance mechanisms against beta-lactam antibiotics. Beyond their clinical importance, they have also become key models in enzymology and evolutionary biochemistry. A global understanding of their evolution and sequence and functional diversity can therefore aid a wide set of different disciplines. Interestingly, beta-lactamases have evolved multiple times from distinct evolutionary origins, with ancestries that reach back billions of years. It is therefore no surprise that these enzymes exhibit diverse structural features and enzymatic mechanisms. In this review, we provide a bird's eye view on the evolution of beta-lactamases within the two enzyme superfamilies-i.e. the penicillin-binding protein-like and metallo-beta-lactamase superfamily-through phylogenetics. We further discuss potential evolutionary origins of each beta-lactamase class by highlighting signs of evolutionary connections in protein functions between beta-lactamases and other enzymes, especially cases of enzyme promiscuity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available