4.1 Article

Rethinking society and knowledge in Finnish social studies textbooks

Journal

JOURNAL OF CURRICULUM STUDIES
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages 857-873

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2021.1881169

Keywords

Social studies; Finnish basic education; textbooks; powerful knowledge; social reproduction; systems theory

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [314708]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [314708, 314708] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the relationship between knowledge and society in social studies, analyzing how society is presented in Finnish social studies textbooks. The findings indicate that due to the institutional approach, the textbooks offer few tools for critical understanding and changing society.
This paper discusses the relationship between knowledge and society in social studies by analysing how society is presented in four Finnish social studies textbooks currently in use in comprehensive education. Besides its empirical contribution, the paper examines the possibilities of applying Michael Young's understanding of powerful knowledge in social studies by complementing it with two additional theoretical approaches to society. Firstly, by applying Basil Bernstein's concept of recontextualisation, it is possible to elaborate on the way in which social studies textbooks reproduce societal power relations. Secondly, by observing the society of social studies textbooks in the light of Niklas Luhmann ' s social systems theory, it is possible to examine how social reproduction in social studies is related to temporal forms of knowledge in a functionally differentiated, multifaceted society. The findings indicate that due to the present-focused and institutional approach to society, the textbooks offer few tools for critical understanding and for changing society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available