4.2 Article

On the politics of discomfort

Journal

FEMINIST THEORY
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 556-574

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1464700120987379

Keywords

Affective methodologies; affective praxis; discomfort; feminist research praxis; epistemic politics; interpretive hesitancy; whiteness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses discomfort as a critical but neglected aspect of feminist methodologies and research praxis, arguing that discomfort can be a resource for transformation and resistance. The author theorizes discomfort as an affective intensity that is important for opening up resistant feminist research practices and knowledge production.
This article engages the politics of discomfort as a critical but neglected dimension of feminist methodologies and research praxis. Discomfort is explored as a 'sweaty concept' that opens space for transformative praxis and the emergence of feminist forms of knowing, being and resisting. I theorise discomfort as an epistemic and interpretive resource and a lively actant in research encounters, fieldwork and analytic and theory-praxis spaces. Building on the work of Clare Hemmings and Sara Ahmed, I trace discomfort as an affective intensity that matters for opening up resistant and anti-colonial feminist research practices and modes of knowledge production. Starting, and staying, with discomfortis theorised as a form of resistance to the reiteration of comfortable and normative truths and 'wilful ignorances'. Weaving together the work of postqualitative and postcolonial feminist theorists, the sticky praxis of discomfort is conceptualised as involving a number of research strategies, including: (1) engaging with 'gut feelings' and (2) embracing interpretive hesitancy. In moving beyond an idealisation of empathy as the central affective principle underlying feminist research praxis, this article explores the epistemic and political salience of discomfort as affective intensity, 'sweaty concept' and potentially transformative interpretive resource.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available