4.8 Article

Predicting the bulk modulus of single-layer covalent organic frameworks with square-lattice topology from molecular building-block properties

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 1077-1085

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0nr07666j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. International Max Planck Research School Many Particle Systems in Structured Environment
  2. Chair of Materials Science and Nanotechnology in the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering of TU Dresden
  3. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skodowska-Curie [813036]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the elasticity of different single-layer tetrabenzoporphyrin (H2-TBPor) and phthalocyanine (H2-Pc) based 2D COFs was numerically investigated using a density-functional based tight-binding approach. By calculating the 2D bulk modulus and equivalent spring constants of the molecular building blocks, the researchers were able to predict the 2D bulk modulus based on the properties of the isolated molecules, offering a pathway to optimize the elastic properties of 2D COFs.
Two-dimensional Covalent Organic Frameworks (2D COFs) have attracted a lot of interest because of their potential for a broad range of applications. Different combinations of their molecular building blocks can lead to new materials with different physical and chemical properties. In this study, the elasticity of different single-layer tetrabenzoporphyrin (H2-TBPor) and phthalocyanine (H2-Pc) based 2D COFs is numerically investigated using a density-functional based tight-binding approach. Specifically, we calculate the 2D bulk modulus and the equivalent spring constants of the respective molecular building-blocks. Using a spring network model we are able to predict the 2D bulk modulus based on the properties of the isolated molecules. This provides a path to optimize elastic properties of 2D COFs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available