4.7 Article

The Qingdao Preschooler Facial Expression Set: Acquisition and Validation of Chinese Children's Facial Emotion Stimuli

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.554821

Keywords

emotional stimulus; positive emotion; facial expression; preschooler; emotion perception

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31771226, U1736220]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focuses on the acquisition and evaluation of the Qingdao Preschooler Facial Expression (QPFE) set, which features images of emotion expressions of 54 Chinese preschoolers. The set includes pictures of six basic emotions, five positive emotions, and a neutral expression, evaluated by 43 adult raters online. The data contributes to research on children's emotion expressions and positive emotions.
Traditional research on emotion-face processing has primarily focused on the expression of basic emotions using adult emotional face stimuli. Stimulus sets featuring child faces or emotions other than basic emotions are rare. The current study describes the acquisition and evaluation of the Qingdao Preschooler Facial Expression (QPFE) set, a facial stimulus set with images featuring 54 Chinese preschoolers' emotion expressions. The set includes 712 standardized color photographs of six basic emotions (joy, fear, anger, sadness, surprise, and disgust), five discrete positive emotions (interest, contentment, relief, pride, and amusement), and a neutral expression. The validity of the pictures was examined based on 43 adult raters' online evaluation, including agreement between designated emotions and raters' labels, as well as intensity and representativeness scores. Overall, these data should contribute to the developmental and cross-cultural research on children's emotion expressions and provide insights for future research on positive emotions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available