4.7 Article

An adaptive Markov chain algorithm applied over map-matching of vehicle trip GPS data

Journal

GEO-SPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 484-497

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10095020.2020.1866956

Keywords

Hidden Markov chain (HMC); map-matching (MM); graph networks

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study has developed an adaptive scheme to modify the Markov Chain kernel window in order to reduce mistakes caused by narrower MC widths as GPS samples are collected. By temporarily increasing the MC window width based on geodesic distances, the results have significantly improved with manageable increase in computational cost. The algorithm's effectiveness is validated through example routes extracted from various vehicle trips.
Markov chains have frequently been applied to match the probable routes with a set of GPS trip data that a pilot vehicle is emitting over a specific graph road network. This class of map-matching (MM) algorithms presently demonstrates and involve statistical and ad-hoc measures to drive the Markov chain transitional probabilities in picking the best route combinations constrained over the graph road network. In this study, we have devised an adaptive scheme to modify the Markov Chain (MC) kernel window as we move along the GPS samples to reduce the mistakes that can happen by the use of narrower MC widths. The measure for temporarily increasing the MC window width is chosen to be the ratio between the geodesic distance of current route to the actual geodesic distance between each pair of GPS samples. This adaptive use of MC has shown to have hardened the results significantly with tolerable computational cost increase. The details of the overall algorithm are depicted by the example routes extracted from various vehicle trips and the results are shown to validate the usefulness of the algorithm in practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available