4.6 Review

Knowledge management within a strategic alliances context: past, present and future

Journal

JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 1782-1810

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JKM-06-2020-0443

Keywords

Joint ventures; Strategic alliances; Bibliometric analysis; Knowledge management; Co-citation; Bibliographic coupling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews the knowledge management research field within a strategic alliance context, analyzing the historical roots, temporal progression, current state, and potential future using bibliometric and structured network analysis. The findings suggest a growth in publications in the field, with details on impactful authors, main outlets, and the conceptual structure of the research field.
Purpose - This paper aims at reviewing the extant knowledge management (KM) research field within a strategic alliance context to understand the historical roots, its temporal progression, current state and potential future in a meaningful way. Design/methodology/approach - Data for this study was retrieved from the Scopus database using a systematic literature search process. The bibliometric characteristics of 393 research documents were analyzed using bibliometric and structured network analysis. Findings - The findings of the study suggest that the publication in the field have been growing with an average rate of 8.48%. This analysis also lists the most productive and impactful authors, main outlets, and the most impactful secondary and primary publication in the field. In addition, the conceptual and intellectual structure of the research field was constructed and discussed. Originality/value - This paper uses an objective and quantitative approach by reviewing the related publications and virtually included all the relevant publications in the analysis, which was seen to be uneconomical when doing traditional literature reviews.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available