3.9 Article

Cost, reliability, convenience, equity or image? The cases for and against the introduction of light rail and bus rapid transit in inners suburban Adelaide, South Australia

Journal

CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 271-279

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2021.01.001

Keywords

Adelaide Australia; Public transport; Light rail transit; Bus rapid transit; Global City Image

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The inner and middle suburbs of Adelaide South Australia have low levels of public transport use and high levels of private motor vehicle use, mainly due to the absence of a rapid transit system. The government plans to reintroduce light rail in these suburbs to enhance the city's image and promote urban infill. Research suggests that adopting a "Curitiba" styled bus rapid transit is the best option, as it is cost-effective, can cater to more residents, and provide a reliable and convenient service.
The inner and middle suburbs of Adelaide South Australia have low levels of public transport use and high levels of private motor vehicle use for commuting compared to the inner and middle suburbs of Australia's other major cities. A major reason for this is an absence of a rapid transit system in the region and the subsequent reliance upon bus commuter services in mixed traffic. The state government has proposed reintroducing light rail 'trams' into inner and middle suburbs as radial routes connected to the central business district. The justification for the reintroduction is largely concerned with enhancing the city's global image and facilitating urban infill. This article uses evidence from a literature review and statistical and physical analyses to ascertain the appropriateness of four common public transport systems, buses in mixed traffic, heavy rail transit, light rail transit and bus rapid transit for a central area of Adelaide South Australia where a new light rail line is proposed. This article argues 'Curitiba' styled bus rapid transit is the best option for the area because it is far less expensive than light or heavy rail, it has the potential to provide a rapid transit option for significantly more existing residents in the area, and would be more reliable and convenient for the people in its catchment. In doing so it can also provide a more equitable service.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available