3.8 Article

The Effect of Blue-Enriched Lighting on Medical Error Rate in a University Hospital ICU

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.11.007

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Midwest Lighting Institute (Cottage Grove, Wisconsin)
  2. Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) program, through the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [1UL1TR002373]
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the use of blue-enriched light in a university hospital adult ICU did not reduce the overall medical error rate. Future studies need more power to evaluate the effects of lighting in reducing fatigue-related medical errors and errors of differing severity.
Background: Fatigue-related errors that occur during patient care impose a tremendous socioeconomic impact on the health care system. Blue-enriched light has been shown to promote alertness and attention. The present study tested whether blue-enriched light can help to reduce medical errors in a university hospital adult ICU. Methods: In this interventional study, a blue-enriched white light emitting diode was used to enhance traditional fluorescent light at the nurse workstation and common areas in the ICU. Medical errors were identified retrospectively using an established two-step surveillance process. Suspected incidents of potential errors detected on nurse chart review were subsequently reviewed by two physicians blinded to lighting conditions, who made final classifications. Error rates were compared between the preintervention fluorescent and postintervention blue-enriched lighting conditions using Poisson regression. Results: The study included a total of 1,073 ICU admissions, 522 under traditional and 551 under interventional lighting (age range 17-97 years, mean age +/- standard deviation 58.5 +/- 15.8). No difference was found in overall medical error rate (harmful and non-harmful) pre- vs. postintervention, 45.5 vs. 42.7 per 1,000 patient-days (rate ratio: 0.94, 95% confidence interval = 0.71-1.23, p= 0.64). Conclusion: Interventional lighting did not have an effect on overall medical error rate. The study was likely underpowered to detect the 25% error reduction predicted. Future studies are required that are powered to assess more modest effects for lighting to reduce the risk of fatigue-related medical errors and errors of differing severity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available