4.6 Article

Thickness dependence of work function, ionization energy, and electron affinity of Mo and W dichalcogenides from DFT and GW calculations

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 103, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.085404

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A2C3013673]
  2. KISTI Supercomputing Center [KSC-2019-CRE-0195]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [4199990114260] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study accurately determines the work function, ionization energy, and electron affinity of few-layer and bulk MX2 through density functional theory and GW calculations, analyzing the impact of thickness on these properties and discussing the band alignment types of these compounds.
Transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are promising for two-dimensional (2D) semiconducting devices and novel phenomena. For 2D applications, their work function, ionization energy, and electron affinity are required as a function of thickness, but research on this is yet to cover the full family of compounds. Here, we present the work function, ionization energy, and electron affinity of few-layer and bulk MX2 (M = Mo, W and X = S, Se, Te) in 2H phase obtained accurately by the density functional theory and GW calculations. For each compound, we consider one-, two-, three-, four-layer, and bulk geometry. In GW calculations, accurate results are obtained by nonuniform q sampling for two-dimensional geometry. From band energies including the GW self-energy correction, we estimate the work function, band gap, ionization energy, and electron affinity as functions of the number of layers. We compare our results with available theoretical and experimental reports, and we discuss types of band alignments in in-plane and out-of-plane junctions of these few-layer and bulk TMDs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available