4.6 Article

Academic expectations among university students and staff: addressing the role of psychological contracts and social norms

Journal

HIGHER EDUCATION
Volume 82, Issue 5, Pages 847-863

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-020-00668-2

Keywords

Expectations; Psychological contracts; Social norms; Qualitative analysis; Student success

Funding

  1. Scholarship of Learning and Teaching Grant from La Trobe University
  2. School of Life Sciences
  3. Department of Ecology, Environment and Evolution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although academic expectations of students and staff aligned in most areas, students have broader conceptions of success at university and prioritize personal relationships with staff and teaching quality more than staff. Academics have stronger injunctive norms about prioritization of study and identifying as a student. These differences may lead to tension between the two groups, particularly in areas of individual values.
Student expectations of required workload, behaviour, resource use, role and relationship profoundly shape success in higher education and inform satisfaction with their learning experience. Teachers' expectations of students' behaviour can similarly affect the university learning experience and environment. When expectations between academic staff and students are not aligned, student satisfaction and staff morale are likely to suffer. This study sought to identify areas where the academic expectations of students and staff aligned or diverged and understand responses to any breaches of expectations. Here, we report on qualitative findings from a survey of 259 undergraduate students and 48 staff members and focus group interviews with 10 students and 15 staff members. Although their academic expectations aligned in most areas, students appeared to have broader conceptions of success at university than staff, and a stronger focus on the importance of personal relationships with staff and teaching quality. Academics expressed stronger injunctive norms about prioritisation of study and the importance of identifying as a student. These differences are likely to lead to tension between the two groups, particularly in areas of value for individuals. While clarifying expectations may improve alignment between the groups to some extent, the basis of these differences in individual priorities suggests that merely articulating expectations may not resolve the issue. We therefore argue for staff to adopt a co-creation approach to academic expectations and to 'meet students halfway' where possible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available