4.3 Article

Light, flight and the night: effect of ambient light and moon phase on flight activity of pteropodid bats

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00359-020-01461-3

Keywords

Pteropodids; Ambient light; Twilight zones; Moon phases; Flight activity

Funding

  1. IISERTVM
  2. Swedish Research Council [2012-2212]
  3. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fruit-feeding pteropodid bats choose roosts under varying light conditions. Tree-roosting bats and cave-roosting bats show significant differences in flight emergence and termination times, with cave-roosting bats flying at comparatively lower light levels. The observed interspecific differences suggest that bat species in the same landscapes may respond differently to light pollution.
Fruit-feeding pteropodid bats roost under varying light conditions. Some roost in trees with high exposure to daylight (> 1000 lx), while others roost in dark caves (< 0.1 lx). To understand the effect of ambient light intensity and moon phase on flight activity, we examined flight times across five lunar cycles in three pteropodid species whose roosts differ in daylight exposure. We found significant interspecific differences in flight emergence and termination times. All species initiated flights after sunset but Rousettus leschenaultii, which typically roosts in caves, delayed emergence (40 +/- 11 min) more than the two tree-roosting species Pteropus giganteus (16 +/- 6 min) and Cynopterus sphinx (19 +/- 7 min). R. leschenaultii terminated flights earlier (30 +/- 7 min before sunrise) than P. giganteus (11 +/- 11 min) and C. sphinx (16 +/- 10 min). All individuals from P. giganteus and C. sphinx roosts emerged within less than an hour, while emergence times were more spread out in the R. leschenaultii colony. Peak emergence times differed across moon phases in the cave-roosting R. leschenaultii but not in the other species. Flight activity in R. leschenaultii is restricted to comparatively lower light levels than the tree-roosting species. The observed interspecific differences suggest that bat species, sharing same landscapes may respond differently to light pollution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available