4.7 Article

Ballistic diffusion of heavy quarks in the early stage of relativistic heavy ion collisions at RHIC and the LHC

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 103, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.034029

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [11805087, 11875153]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the CentralUniversities [862946]
  3. China Scholarship Council [201806180032]
  4. European Union [824093]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the diffusion of charm quarks in the early stage of high energy nuclear collisions and introduces the concept of color current carried by heavy quarks. The impact of diffusion on the nuclear modification factor is calculated and analyzed, showing a memory effect of the color force acting on charm quarks.
We study the diffusion of charm quarks in the early stage of high energy nuclear collisions at the RHIC and the LHC. The main novelty of the present study is the introduction of the color current carried by the heavy quarks that propagate in the evolving glasma (EG), which is responsible of the energy loss via polarization of the medium. We compute the transverse momentum broadening, sigma(p), of charm in the prethermalization stage, and the impact of the diffusion on the nuclear modification factor in nucleus-nucleus collisions. The net effect of energy loss is marginal in the prethermalization stage. The study is completed by the calculation of coordinate spreading, sigma(x), and by a comparison with Langevin dynamics. sigma(p) in EG overshoots the result of standard Langevin dynamics at the end of the prehydro regime. We interpret this as a result of memory of the color force acting on the charm quarks that implies sigma(p) proportional to t(2). Moreover, sigma(x) proportional to t(2) in the prehydro stage shows that the charm quark in the EG is in the regime of ballistic diffusion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available