3.9 Article

The baseline recurrence risk of patients with intermediate-risk cervical cancer

Journal

OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY SCIENCE
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages 226-233

Publisher

Korean Soc Obstetrics and Gynecology (KSOG)
DOI: 10.5468/ogs.20243

Keywords

Uterine cervical neoplasms; Recurrence; Carcinoma; Squamous cells; Adenocarcinoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that patients with intermediate-risk cervical cancer, specifically those with squamous cell carcinoma, had good prognosis without adjuvant therapy. On the other hand, patients with endocervical adenocarcinoma, usual type, or adenosquamous carcinoma had a poorer prognosis without adjuvant therapy. Therefore, adjuvant therapy may be omitted for the former group while it should be considered for the latter group.
Objective This study aimed to investigate the prognosis of patients with intermediate-risk cervical cancer and to evaluate the necessity of adjuvant therapy. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with stage IB-II cervical cancer who underwent type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy between 2008 and 2017. In our institution, radical hysterectomy is performed as an open surgery and not as a minimally invasive surgery, and adjuvant therapy is not administered to patients with intermediate-risk cervical cancer. The intermediate-risk group included patients with 2 or more of the following factors: tumor size >4 cm, stromal invasion >1/2, and lymphovascular stromal invasion. Intermediate-risk patients with squamous cell carcinoma were included in the I-SCC group, whereas those with endocervical adenocarcinoma, usual type, or adenosquamous carcinoma were included in the I-Adeno group. Results There were 34 and 18 patients in the I-SCC and I-Adeno groups, respectively. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival rates in the I-SCC group were 90.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.3-95.7%) and 100% (95% CI, 100%), respectively, whereas those in the I-Adeno group were 54.9% (95% CI, 42.0-67.9%) and 76.1% (95% CI, 63.7-88.4%), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that endocervical adenocarcinoma, usual type, or adenosquamous carcinoma, and tumor size >4 cm had worse RFS. Conclusion The I-SCC group had good prognosis without adjuvant therapy; therefore, adjuvant therapy may be omitted in these patients. In contrast, the I-Adeno group had poor prognosis without adjuvant therapy; therefore, adjuvant therapy should be considered in their treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available