4.6 Article

An assessment of the structural resolution of various fingerprints commonly used in machine learning

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/2632-2153/abb212

Keywords

machine learning; symmetry functions; structural fingerprints; atomic descriptor; sensitivity matrix; overlap matrix fingerprint; SOAP

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Be3264/13-1, 411538199]
  3. Swiss National Supercomputer (CSCS) [s963]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compares the performance of different atomic environment fingerprints and their ability to resolve differences in local environments, while also examining the related atomic movements and fingerprint invariance.
Atomic environment fingerprints are widely used in computational materials science, from machine learning potentials to the quantification of similarities between atomic configurations. Many approaches to the construction of such fingerprints, also called structural descriptors, have been proposed. In this work, we compare the performance of fingerprints based on the overlap matrix, the smooth overlap of atomic positions, Behler-Parrinello atom-centered symmetry functions, modified Behler-Parrinello symmetry functions used in the ANI-1ccx potential and the Faber-Christensen-Huang-Lilienfeld fingerprint under various aspects. We study their ability to resolve differences in local environments and in particular examine whether there are certain atomic movements that leave the fingerprints exactly or nearly invariant. For this purpose, we introduce a sensitivity matrix whose eigenvalues quantify the effect of atomic displacement modes on the fingerprint. Further, we check whether these displacements correlate with the variation of localized physical quantities such as forces. Finally, we extend our examination to the correlation between molecular fingerprints obtained from the atomic fingerprints and global quantities of entire molecules.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available