4.4 Article

Tailoring Temporal Message Frames to Individuals' Time Orientation Strengthens the Relationship between Risk Perception and Behavioral Intention

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 971-981

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2021.1878310

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Yonsei University Future-leading Research Initiative of 2019 [RMS2 2019-22-0215]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research examines the impact of risk perception on behavioral intention and finds that the congruence between temporal frame and individuals' trait time orientation is an important moderator. The results show that the relationship between risk perception and behavioral intention is significantly stronger when temporal frames and CFC are more congruent.
While health behavior theories conceptualize risk perception as a major factor motivating protective action against risk, empirical support for this widely-assumed proposition has been inconclusive. Given the inherent issue concerning the delay of desired outcomes in most health behaviors, this research proposes the congruence between temporal frame and individuals' trait time orientation (i.e., consideration of future consequences; CFC) as an important moderator in the risk perception-behavioral intention relationship. Findings from two experiments concerning messages promoting adequate sleep (N = 227; Study 1) and plastic bottle recycling (N = 223; Study 2) showed that the relationship between risk perception and behavioral intention was significantly stronger when temporal frames and CFC were more congruent (i.e., tailored). Nuanced differences in the moderating effects of frame-CFC congruence were observed depending on how risk perception was operationalized (i.e., susceptibility only, severity only, or combination of the two). Implications for health communication message design are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available