4.6 Article

Theoretical and Experimental Perspectives of Quantum Verification

Journal

PRX QUANTUM
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010102

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union Horizon 2020 program [817482, 731473]
  2. US Air Force Office of Scientific Research via IOE Grant [FA9550-19-1-7044 LASCEM]
  3. Simons Collaboration on Ultra-Quantum Matter from Simons Foundation [651440]
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P32273-N27]
  5. Institut fur Quanteninformation
  6. SFB BeyondC
  7. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P32273] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The discussion focused on verifying quantum devices through specific examples like Hamiltonian learning, comparing quantum states on different devices, and ensuring the correctness of quantum processor output from a computer science perspective.
In this perspective we discuss verification of quantum devices in the context of specific examples formulated as proposed experiments. Our first example is verification of analog quantum simulators as Hamiltonian learning, where the input Hamiltonian as the design goal is compared with the parent Hamiltonian for the quantum states prepared on the device. The second example discusses cross-device verification on the quantum level (i.e., by comparing quantum states prepared on different quantum devices). We focus in particular on protocols using randomized measurements, and we propose establishing a central data repository, where existing experimental devices and platforms can be compared. In our final example, we address verification of the output of a quantum device from a computer science perspective, addressing the question of how a user of a quantum processor can be certain of the correctness of its output, and propose minimal demonstrations on present-day devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available