4.2 Article

The path to dissociative experiences: A direct comparison of different etiological models

Journal

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 1091-1102

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2559

Keywords

dissociative experiences; dreaming; aetiology; longitudinal design; psychopathology; sleep

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation [1895/13, 539/13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Severe dissociation is linked to trauma, but dissociative experiences are also present in clinical populations with conditions like depression and anxiety. This study found that psychological distress, negative affectivity, and poor sleep quality all uniquely contribute to dissociative experiences. Unusual dreaming showed stronger correlation with dissociation compared to traditional sleep quality measures, when considering psychological distress.
Severe dissociation is trauma-related, but a range of dissociative experiences are also prevalent in clinical populations that are not necessarily trauma-based (e.g., depression, anxiety disorders, and obsessive-compulsive disorders). These remain poorly understood as the dominant etiological model for dissociation relies on trauma. Importantly, dissociation in such samples predicts poor prognosis and high drop-out rates. We set out to better understand the aetiology of dissociative experiences in a mixed clinical (anxiety and depression) and community sample by exploring between- and within-subjects effects of two domains: psychological distress or negative affectivity (operationalized as anxiety and depression symptoms), and poor sleep quality, including disturbed dreaming. The idea that negative affectivity triggers dissociation (Distress Model) is inspired by the trauma model. The idea that poor sleep and unusual dreaming underlie dissociation (Sleep Model) has been suggested as a competing theory. We examined both models by exploring which domains oscillate alongside dissociative experiences. N = 98 adults, half of them diagnosed with depression and anxiety and half community controls, underwent a structured clinical interview and completed questionnaires monthly for 6 months. Support was found for both models in that each domain had a unique explanatory contribution. Distress evinced consistent effects that could not be explained by sleep or dreaming, both between individuals and across time. Oscillations in dissociation across months, when taking psychological distress into account, were better explained by unusual dreaming than traditional sleep quality measures. These findings cannot be generalized to highly-traumatized samples. A complex, integrated etiological model for dissociative experiences is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available