4.7 Article

Sensitive impedimetric detection of E. coli with metal-organic framework (MIL-53) / polymer (PEDOT) composite modified screen-printed electrodes

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104925

Keywords

E. coli; Impedimetric sensing; Differential pulse voltammetry; MIL-53; PEDOT:PSS; Composite

Funding

  1. Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India
  2. Department of Science and Technology (DST, India) [GAP-397 (EMR/2016/006480)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed an electrochemical biosensing system for E. coli detection, using a composite-modified electrode for specific detection within a wide concentration range. The results were validated against standard techniques, demonstrating successful detection and tolerance to possible interfering species.
Present work details the development of an electrochemical biosensing system for E. coli. A composite of a metal organic framework (MOF), i.e. MIL-53 (Fe) (MIL = Materials of Institut Lavoisier) with poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) has been prepared and used to modify the carbon-screen printed electrodes (cSPE). Due to the addition of PEDOT:PSS, the composite has exhibited electrochemical conductivity along with several other known beneficial features of MOF. The composite modified cSPE has been functionalized with anti-E. coli antibodies to guarantee the specificity of the detection. The present electrochemical sensor, based on the measurement of electrochemical impedance spectroscopic and different pulse voltammetry signals, has allowed the detection of E. coli over a wide concentration range of 2.1 x 10(2) to 2.1 x 10(8) cfu/mL, with the best detection limit of 4 cfu/mL. The sensor could also tolerate the co-presence of other possibly interfering species, such as S. aureus and S. arlettae. The results obtained from the present system have been validated against standard techniques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available