4.6 Article

Natural abundance oxygen-17 solid-state NMR of metal organic frameworks enhanced by dynamic nuclear polarization

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 2245-2251

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp06064j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. GENCI-TGCC [2019-AP010910927]
  2. Equipex grant Paris en resonance'' [ANR-10-EQPX-09]
  3. ERC [339754]
  4. ANR Project MeaCoPA [ANR-17-CE29-0003]
  5. Paris Ile-de-France Region/Respore program
  6. IR-RMN-THC CNRS [FR3050]
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [339754] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the investigation of O-17 resonances in zirconium-oxo clusters within porous Zr carboxylate MOFs was carried out using DNP-enhanced MAS NMR spectroscopy. Through high-resolution spectral analysis, O-17 sites were successfully resolved with the assistance of DFT calculations and cross-polarization techniques.
The O-17 resonances of zirconium-oxo clusters that can be found in porous Zr carboxylate metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been investigated by magic-angle spinning (MAS) NMR spectroscopy enhanced by dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP). High-resolution O-17 spectra at 0.037% natural abundance could be obtained in 48 hours, thanks to DNP enhancement of the H-1 polarization by factors epsilon(H-1) = S-with/S-without = 28, followed by H-1 -> O-17 cross-polarization, allowing a saving in experimental time by a factor of ca. 800. The distinct O-17 sites from the oxo-clusters can be resolved at 18.8 T. Their assignment is supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations of chemical shifts and quadrupolar parameters. Protonation of O-17 sites seems to be leading to large characteristic shifts. Hence, natural abundance O-17 NMR spectra of diamagnetic MOFs can thus be used to probe and characterize the local environment of different O-17 sites on an atomic scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available