4.7 Article

Debiased Galaxy Cluster Pressure Profiles from X-Ray Observations and Simulations

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 908, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd0ff

Keywords

Galaxy clusters; Large-scale structure of the universe; Observational cosmology; Cosmology; Intracluster medium

Funding

  1. Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago [PHY-1125897, AST-1714658]
  2. Kavli Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An updated model for average cluster pressure profile has been proposed, incorporating results from X-ray observations and cosmological simulations to correct hydrostatic mass bias. Analysis of existing data using this model reveals adjustments to previously inferred values for cluster masses and pressures.
We present an updated model for the average cluster pressure profile, adjusted for hydrostatic mass bias by combining results from X-ray observations with cosmological simulations. Our model estimates this bias by fitting a power law to the relation between the true halo mass and X-ray cluster mass in hydrodynamic simulations (IllustrisTNG, BAHAMAS, and MACSIS). As an example application, we consider the REXCESS X-ray cluster sample and the universal pressure profile derived from scaled and stacked pressure profiles. We find adjusted masses, M-500c, that are less than or similar to 15% higher and scaled pressures P/P-500c that have less than or similar to 35% lower normalization than previously inferred. Our debiased pressure profile (DPP) is well-fit by a generalized Navarro-Frenk-White function, with parameters [P-0, c(500), alpha, beta, gamma] = [5.048, 1.217, 1.192, 5.490, 0.433] and does not require a mass-dependent correction term. When the DPP is used to model the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect, we find that the integrated Compton Y-M relation has only minor deviations from self-similar scaling. The thermal SZ angular power spectrum is lower in amplitude by approximately 30%, assuming nominal cosmological parameters (e.g., omega(m) = 0.3, sigma(8) = 0.8), and is broadly consistent with recent Planck results without requiring additional bias corrections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available