4.6 Article

High-temperature CO2 perm-selectivity of yttrium-doped SDC ceramic-carbonate dual-phase membranes

Journal

REACTION CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 321-334

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0re00375a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SENER-CONACYT [251801]
  2. CONACYT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work presents the synthesis and evaluation of ceramic supports made of yttrium and samarium co-doped CeO2 (Y-SDC) for synthesizing ceramic-carbonate dual-phase membranes. They were found to be thermally and chemically stable at high temperatures in acid environments. The ionic conductivity of Y-SDC depends on the O-2 partial pressure and yttrium content, and improving CO2 permeation was achieved by tailoring the membrane microstructure.
This work presents the synthesis and evaluation of ceramic supports made of yttrium and samarium co-doped CeO2 (Y-SDC) for synthesizing ceramic-carbonate dual-phase membranes. Their Y : Sm atomic concentration ratio was varied, using a total dopant content of 20 mol%. The Y-SDC supports were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, and electrical conductivity under different atmospheres, for determining the chemical and thermal stability and the intrinsic properties of the ceramic supports. The supports were infiltrated with molten carbonates for making dense dual-phase membranes, and CO2 permeation tests were conducted using a feed gas mixture of CO2/N-2 between 700 and 900 degrees C at 1 bar. This study establishes that Y-SDC supports are thermally and chemically stable at high temperatures in acid environments. The ionic conductivity of Y-SDC depends on the O-2 partial pressure and yttrium content. The CO2 permeation flux results of the dense ceramic-carbonate dual-phase membrane are correlated to the ionic conductivity of Y-SDC. Moreover, the CO2 permeation is improved by tailoring the membrane microstructure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available