4.5 Article

Abiotic formation of organic biomorphs under diagenetic conditions

Journal

GEOCHEMICAL PERSPECTIVES LETTERS
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages 40-46

Publisher

EUROPEAN ASSOC GEOCHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.7185/geochemlet.2102

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MNHN
  2. Region Ile de France grant SESAME [I-07-593/R]
  3. INSU-CNRS
  4. INP-CNRS
  5. UPMC-Paris 6
  6. AgenceNationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-07-BLAN-0124-01]
  7. Chevreul Institute
  8. European FEDER
  9. IMPMC spectroscopy platform
  10. Region Nord-Pas-de-Calais
  11. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-07-BLAN-0124] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ancient fossil record provides crucial information on the diversity and disparity of ancient life, but decoding it can be challenging due to geological history. This study demonstrates that abiotic organic cell-like microstructures meeting biogenicity criteria can form under classical diagenesis conditions.
The most ancient fossil record contains fundamentally important information on both the diversity and disparity of ancient life. Yet this ancient record is not that easy to decode, due to difficulties mainly pertaining to the impact of the geological history. Thus, the convergence of multiple lines of evidence is seen as necessary to build a robust demonstration of the biogenicity of putative traces of life. Yet, we experimentally show here that abiotic organic cell-like microstructures meeting all the criteria of biogenicity may form in cherts under classical conditions of diagenesis. These organic biomorphs produced from a mixture of RNA and quartz in water exposed to temperature and pressure conditions (200 degrees C, similar to 15 bars) exhibit morphological, chemical and isotopic signatures typical of organic microfossils. The results of this study exemplify the pitfalls that Archean palaeontologists may encounter when searching for traces of life in ancient rocks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available