4.7 Article

Isothermal degradation kinetics of the probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum by thermogravimetry

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
Volume 146, Issue 6, Pages 2543-2547

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-021-10557-0

Keywords

Probiotics; Lactobacillus fermentum; Arrhenius; Thermal analysis; Thermogravimetry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study determined the thermal degradation parameters of probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum using thermogravimetry, calculating the degradation rate constant and activation energy. The results obtained also provided a simulated shelf life value. Thermogravimetry is a useful tool for determining degradation rate parameters of compounds, including pharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals, and realistic data is essential for defining shelf life.
Lactobacillus fermentum is a probiotic that belongs to the group of lactic acid bacteria and presents high intestinal colonization capacity after oral administration. To maintain its quality during manufacturing to its expiration, the physical and chemical stability of the probiotic remains a major challenge and concern. This work aimed to determine the thermal degradation parameters of the probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum by thermogravimetry (TG), calculated using the Arrhenius mathematical model. The probiotic degradation followed a second-order kinetics, where the rate of its degradation depends on the concentration of two or more reactants, presenting degradation rate constant of 6.23 x 10(-10) min(-1) at 25 degrees C and an activation energy of 21,987 cal mol(-1). The value corresponding to the simulate shelf life was also obtained. TG is an extremely useful tool, simple and fast to determine the degradation rate parameters of the compounds including pharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals. The shelf life needs to be defined by realist data. This is the first time that was used TG to determine the degradation reaction of probiotics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available