4.6 Article

Stock market liberalization and innovation

Journal

JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS
Volume 139, Issue 3, Pages 985-1014

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.08.018

Keywords

Stock market liberalization; Innovation; Equity financing; Risk sharing; Corporate governance

Funding

  1. ARC Linkage grant from the Australian Research Council [LP130101050]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71790591, 91746301, 71825002]
  3. Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program [BJJWZYJH 01201910003014]
  4. Australian Research Council [LP130101050] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our research reveals a positive impact of stock market liberalization on technological innovation, particularly in more innovative industries. Financial constraints relaxation, increased risk sharing, and improved corporate governance are potential promoting factors. Technological innovation is a key mechanism through which stock market liberalization affects economic growth.
We investigate the effect of stock market liberalization on technological innovation. Using a sample of 20 economies that experience stock market liberalization, we find that these economies exhibit a higher level of innovation output after liberalization and that this effect is disproportionately stronger in more innovative industries. The relaxation of financial constraints, enhanced risk sharing between domestic and foreign investors, and improved corporate governance are three plausible channels that allow stock market liberalization to promote innovation. Finally, we show that technological innovation is a mechanism through which stock market liberalization affects productivity growth and therefore economic growth. Our paper provides new insights into the real effects of stock market liberalization on productivity growth and the economy. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available