4.7 Article

Electrospun GelMA fibers and p(HEMA) matrix composite for corneal tissue engineering

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111720

Keywords

Biomaterial; Cell adhesion and growth; Composites; Hydrogels; Protein adsorption

Funding

  1. Izmir Institute of Technology Scientific Research Project [IYTE 0322]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A biocompatible and transparent GelMA-p(HEMA) composite hydrogel was fabricated for corneal tissue engineering, showing approximately 70% optical transmittance at 550 nm. The composite exhibited good biocompatibility with tear fluid proteins, making it suitable for cell adhesion and growth, suggesting its potential application in the development of corneal tissue engineering.
The development of biocompatible and transparent three-dimensional materials is desirable for corneal tissue engineering. Inspired from the cornea structure, gelatin methacryloyl-poly(2-hydroxymethyl methacrylate) (GelMA-p(HEMA)) composite hydrogel was fabricated. GelMA fibers were produced via electrospinning and covered with a thin layer of p(HEMA) in the presence of N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide (MBA) as cross-linker by drop-casting. The structure of resulting GelMA-p(HEMA) composite was characterized by spectrophotometry, microscopy, and swelling studies. Biocompatibility and biological properties of the both p(HEMA) and GelMA-p (HEMA) composite have been investigated by 3D cell culture, red blood cell hemolysis, and protein adsorption studies (i.e., human serum albumin, human immunoglobulin and egg white lysozyme). The optical transmittance of the GelMA-p(HEMA) composite was found to be approximately 70% at 550 nm. The GelMA-p(HEMA) composite was biocompatible with tear fluid proteins and convenient for cell adhesion and growth. Thus, as prepared hydrogel composite may find extensive applications in future for the development of corneal tissue engineering as well as preparation of stroma of the corneal material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available