Journal
SN APPLIED SCIENCES
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages -Publisher
SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-021-04252-w
Keywords
Reduced order model; Data-driven; System identification; Aerodynamics; Aeroelasticity
Categories
Funding
- NASA [80NSSC18P1879]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper investigates the state consistence of parametric data-driven reduced order models obtained by various system identification methods, finding that only the ARX-based aerodynamic ROM preserves the state consistence.
This paper investigates the state consistence of parametric data-driven reduced order models (ROMs) in a state-space form obtained by various system identification methods, including autoregressive exogenous (ARX) and subspace identification (N4SID), for aeroelastic analysis in varying flight conditions. The target flight envelop is first partitioned into discrete grid points, on each of which an aerodynamic ROM is constructed using system identification to capture the dependence of the generalized aerodynamic force on the generalized displacement of structural modes. High-fidelity aeroelastic modal perturbation simulations are used to generate the ROM training and verification data. Aerodynamic ROMs not on the grid point are obtained by interpolating those at neighboring grid points. Through a thorough analysis of the model coefficients and pole migration, it is found that only the ARX-based aerodynamic ROM preserves the state consistence, and hence, allowing direct interpolation of system matrices at the non-grid point and rapid aerodynamic ROM database development in the entire flight parameter space. In contrast, N4SID-based ROM destroys the state consistence and yields physically meaningless results when ROMs are interpolated. The origin of the difference in the state consistence caused by both methods is also discussed. The interpolated ARX aerodynamic ROMs coupled with the structural ROM for parametric aeroelastic analysis exhibit excellent agreement with the high fidelity full order model (mostly <5% relative error) and salient computational efficiency.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available