4.6 Article

Multi-Head Attention Based Popularity Prediction Caching in Social Content-Centric Networking With Mobile Edge Computing

Journal

IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 508-512

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LCOMM.2020.3030329

Keywords

Predictive models; Servers; Decoding; Computer architecture; Feature extraction; Logic gates; Edge computing; Multi-head attention; popularity prediction; caching strategy; mobile edge computing; SocialCCN

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDC02011000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This letter proposes a novel architecture integrating mobile edge computing in a social content-centric network and a multi-head attention based popularity prediction caching strategy. The simulation results show that the proposed model achieves lower predictive error and improves cache hit rate, reducing hop redundancy in the network.
With the rapid growth of social network traffic, the design of an efficient caching strategy is crucial in the social content-centric network (SocialCCN). In order to design a more comprehensive popularity prediction caching strategy, in this letter, we proposed a novel architecture that integrates mobile edge computing (MEC) in SocialCCN (MeSoCCN) and proposed multi-head attention based popularity prediction caching strategy in MeSoCCN. Firstly, we proposed a multi-head attention based popularity prediction model (MAPP) that considers multi-dimensional features including history and future popularity, social relationships, and geographic location to predict content popularity. Then, we design a caching strategy based on the prediction results of MAPP. The simulation results show that the proposed MAPP model achieves lower predictive error and the proposed predictive caching strategy improves cache hit rate and reduces hop redundancy in the network.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available