4.5 Review

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 420, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117225

Keywords

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders; Aquaprin-4 antibody; MOG antibody; Demyelinating disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the past two decades, the disease concept of NMOSD has significantly changed with the detection of MOG antibody and the understanding of immune astrocytopathy. The revised diagnostic criteria have widened the clinical spectrum of NMOSD, allowing for earlier diagnosis and prompt initiation of effective immunosuppression for better long-term outcomes. Challenges still remain in treating seronegative NMOSD due to limited treatment options.
The disease concept of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders(NMOSD) has undergone a significant change over the last two decades including the detection of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein(MOG) antibody in patients who are seronegative for aquaporin-4 antibody. Aquaporin-4 antibody positive NMOSD is now regarded as an immune astrocytopathy. Conversely, MOG antibody associated disease is known to target myelin rather than astrocytes, leading to an NMOSD syndrome with distinct clinical and radiological features. Incorporation of clinical features like area postrema syndrome, brainstem syndrome, diencephalic syndrome and cortical manifestations as core clinical characteristics into the revised diagnostic criteria has widened the clinical spectrum of NMOSD. With the development of these criteria, it is possible to make the diagnosis at an earlier stage so that effective immunosuppression can be instituted promptly for a better long-term prognosis. Newer therapeutic agents have been introduced for aquaporin-4 seropositive NMOSD disease; however, challenges remain in treating seronegative disease because of limited treatment options.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available