4.7 Article

Early Warning Method for Public Health Emergency Under Artificial Neural Network in the Context of Deep Learning

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.594031

Keywords

public health emergencies; artificial neural network; convolutional neural network; structural equation model; early warning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study collected tuberculosis data from a city from 2017 to 2019 and constructed a prediction model. Through comparative analysis, it was found that the early warning method based on ANN in deep learning performs better in improving the early warning capabilities of public health emergencies.
The purpose is to minimize the substantial losses caused by public health emergencies to people's health and daily life and the national economy. The tuberculosis data from June 2017 to 2019 in a city are collected. The Structural Equation Model (SEM) is constructed to determine the relationship between hidden and explicit variables by determining the relevant indicators and parameter estimation. The prediction model based on Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is constructed. The method's effectiveness is verified by comparing the prediction model's loss value and accuracy in training and testing. Meanwhile, 50 pieces of actual cases are tested, and the warning level is determined according to the T-value. The results show that comparing and analyzing ANN, CNN, and the hybrid network of ANN and CNN, the hybrid network's accuracy (95.1%) is higher than the other two algorithms, 89.1 and 90.1%. Also, the hybrid network has sound prediction effects and accuracy when predicting actual cases. Therefore, the early warning method based on ANN in deep learning has better performance in public health emergencies' early warning, which is significant for improving early warning capabilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available