4.7 Article

Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of two centrifugal separators for microplastic sampling

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 414, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125482

Keywords

Hydrocyclone; Continuous flow centrifugation; Measurement uncertainty; FTIR Imaging; Raman Imaging; QA; QC; Microplastic monitoring; Estuarine microplastic pollution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efficient centrifugal separators were proposed for small microplastic sampling, with thorough method optimization and application in an extensive sampling study to investigate retention behavior. The dominant polymer types and concentrations of microplastics were identified, and for the first time, an expanded uncertainty was calculated according to guidelines. The study highlighted the importance of sound uncertainty evaluation in microplastic research.
For commonly applied microplastic sampling approaches based on filtration, high throughput and no sizediscrimination are conflicting goals. Therefore, we propose two efficient centrifugal separators for small microplastic sampling, namely the utilization of a hydrocyclone as well as a continuous flow centrifuge. Thorough method optimization was followed by application in an extensive sampling study to investigate the separators' retention behavior for particulate plastics from estuarine waters. Microplastic concentrations ranged from 193 to 2072 particles m-3. The most dominant identified polymer types were polypropylene, acrylates, polyvinyl chloride and polyethylene. More than 95% of particles were < 100 & micro;m. For the first time in microplastic research, an expanded uncertainty was calculated according to the Guide to the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (JCGM 100:2008). Bottom-up uncertainty evaluation revealed the different sampling methods (- 44%), sample replicates (- 26%) and the different detection techniques (16%) as the major sources of uncertainty. Depending on the number of particles detected in the samples, the relative expanded uncertainty (Urel (k = 2)) ranged from 24% up to > 200% underpinning tremendous importance of sound uncertainty evaluation. Our results indicate that scientist should rethink many observed patterns in the literature due to being insignificant and herewith not real.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available