4.5 Review

Overcoming barriers to physical activity in underserved populations

Journal

PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages 64-71

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.11.002

Keywords

Physical activity; Underserved populations; Chronic disease; Interventions; Communities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is strong evidence that underserved populations, such as racial/ethnic minorities and those with low socioeconomic status, are less likely to engage in sufficient physical activity at recommended levels. Communities of color and low-income individuals face barriers that prevent them from achieving adequate levels of physical activity, but they also have valuable knowledge, assets, and support that can be utilized to help individuals meet physical activity guidelines. This paper outlines barriers to physical activity and explores strategies for overcoming them, drawing from successful, evidence-based interventions that use culturally and linguistically appropriate approaches to increase physical activity in underserved populations.
There is compelling evidence suggesting underserved populations, including racial/ethnic minorities and individuals with low socioeconomic status, are less likely to partake in sufficient amounts of physical activity (PA) at recommended levels. Communities of color and low-income individuals face institutional, societal, and environmental barriers that may prevent them from achieving adequate levels of PA. However, these communities also possess a wealth of knowledge, assets, and support that can be harnessed to help individuals meet PA guidelines. This paper outlines the barriers to PA and explores how to overcome them, drawing from case studies of successful, evidence-based interventions that use culturally-and linguistically-appropriate approaches to increase PA in underserved populations. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available