4.4 Article

Experimentalist Governance with Interactive Central-Local Relations: Making New Pension Policies in China

Journal

POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 13-36

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/psj.12254

Keywords

experimentalist governance; regional policy experimentation; pension policy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates the distinct features of experimentalist governance in China, proposing a framework that combines central-local interactive relations. The central government's concerns for policy performance and the reliance on local responses for policy evaluation are highlighted. Three new patterns of experimentalist governance in China are conceptualized, illustrated through case studies on pension policies for different groups.
Although regional policy experimentation has become a global trend, the distinct features of experimentalist governance in a given country, such as China, remains to be investigated. This article extends policy process theory by proposing the framework of experimentalist governance with interactive central-local relations or Chinese-style experimentalist governance, which combines three features. First, policy goals and instruments are formed separately and interactively by the central and local governments. Second, the central government is burdened with its own concerns about policy performance for maintaining authority and legitimacy. Third, the evaluation of policy pilots relies primarily on the responses of local governments. We further conceptualize three new patterns of experimentalist governance in China, namely, comparative trial, selective recognition, and adaptive reconciliation, in addition to hierarchical experimentation. These patterns are illustrated with case studies on four pension policies in China, which are for public sector employees, urban employees, rural residents, and migrant workers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available