4.6 Article

Carnitine promotes recovery from oxidative stress and extends lifespan in C. elegans

Journal

AGING-US
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 813-830

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC

Keywords

carnitine; aging; oxidative stress; amyloid; transporter

Funding

  1. Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province [2019DK2011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that L-carnitine can improve oxidative stress recovery and prolong lifespan in C. elegans, with its uptake being associated with a new gene T08B1.1, which may play an important role in healthy aging.
Carnitine is required for transporting fatty acids into the mitochondria for beta-oxidation. Carnitine has been used as an energy supplement but the roles in improving health and delaying aging remain unclear. Here we show in C. elegans that L-carnitine improves recovery from oxidative stress and extends lifespan. L-carnitine promotes recovery from oxidative stress induced by paraquat or juglone and improves mobility and survival in response to H2O2 and human amyloid (A beta) toxicity. L-carnitine also alleviates the oxidative stress during aging, resulting in moderate but significant lifespan extension, which was dependent on SKN-1 and DAF-16. Long-lived worms with germline loss (glp-1) or reduced insulin receptor activity (daf-2) recover from aging-associated oxidative stress faster than wild-type controls and their long lifespans were not further increased by L-carnitine. A new gene, T08B1.1, aligned to a known carnitine transporter OCTN1 in humans, is required for L-carnitine uptake in C. elegans. T08B1.1 expression is elevated in daf-2 and glp-1 mutants and its knockdown prevents L-carnitine from improving oxidative stress recovery and prolonging lifespan. Together, our study suggests an important role of Lcarnitine in oxidative stress recovery that might be important for healthy aging in humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available