4.7 Article

Analytical Sensitivity of the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02880-20

Keywords

BinaxNOW; rapid antigen detection; SARS-CoV-2; limit of detection; coronavirus; COVID-19; Abbott; sensitivity

Categories

Funding

  1. Abbott Laboratories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the analytical sensitivity of the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag card, finding detection limits of approximately 4.04 x 10(4) to 8.06 x 10(4) copies/swab, and good detection performance for samples with SARS-CoV-2 viral loads above 40,000 copies/swab.
Multiple rapid antigen (Ag) tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have recently received emergency-use authorization (EUA) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Although less sensitive than molecular detection methods, rapid antigen testing offers the potential for inexpensive, quick, decentralized testing. Robust analytical sensitivity data in comparison to reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) are currently lacking for many rapid antigen tests. Here, we evaluated the analytical sensitivity of the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag card using SARS-CoV-2-positive clinical specimens quantified by reverse transcription-droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) and multiple FDA EUA qRT-PCR platforms using RNA standards. Initial and confirmatory limits of detection for the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag card were determined to be equivalent to 4.04 x 10(4) to 8.06 x 10(4) copies/swab. We further confirmed this limit of detection with 72 additional clinical samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 in either phosphate-buffered saline or viral transport medium. One hundred percent of samples with viral loads of >40,000 copies/swab were detected by rapid antigen testing. These data indicate that the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag card has an analytical sensitivity approximately equivalent to a generic qRT-PCR cycle threshold (C-T) value of 29 to 30.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available