4.6 Article

Quantum secret sharing using discretely modulated coherent states

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 103, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.032410

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61871407]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2020JJ5088]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [531118010371]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a quantum secret sharing (QSS) protocol using discretely modulated coherent states (DMCSs) for multi-user key sharing, with an asymptotic security proof and numerical simulations showing potential transmission distances.
Point-to-point quantum privacy communication over a standard telecommunication fiber link can be implemented by continuous-variable quantum key distribution (CV QKD). However, as communication networks develop, the two-party CV QKD system may hardly meet the requirements of secret key sharing of multiple users (at least three users). In this paper, we consider a protocol called quantum secret sharing (QSS) which allows a legitimate user, a so-called dealer, to share a secret key with multiple remote users through an insecure quantum channel. These users can correctly recover the dealer's secret key only when they work cooperatively. We carry out QSS with discretely modulated coherent states (DMCSs) because they are easy to prepare and resilient to losses. An asymptotic security proof for the proposed DMCS-based QSS protocol against both eavesdroppers and dishonest users is presented. Numerical simulation based on a linear bosonic channel shows that the maximal transmission distance of the DMCS-based QSS protocol reaches more than 100 km, and it can be further lengthened by exploiting a higher-dimensional discrete modulation strategy. Moreover, the composable security of the DMCS-based QSS protocol is also presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available