4.7 Review

Vanadate-based electrodes for rechargeable batteries

Journal

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 1585-1609

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0qm00656d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Research Program of China [2018YFB0905400]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51925207, U1910210, 51872277, 51972067, 21606003, 51802044]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2060140026]
  5. DNL cooperation Fund, CAS [DNL180310]
  6. Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar [2019B151502039]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review provides a detailed overview of the recent developments in the effective use of vanadate-based materials for energy storage systems, focusing on material design approaches and practical applications. Insights into technological advances and issues for ESSs are also presented with an emphasis on vanadate-based electrodes.
In recent decades, both traditional Li-ion batteries and emerging metal-ion batteries have become critical in driving the advancement of energy storage systems (ESSs). However, the lack of appropriate and inexpensive electrode materials that can provide high energy/power density, long-term cyclability and high rate capability is a major obstacle to the practical usage of such technologies. In the history of the search for effective electrodes in battery technologies, vanadate-based compounds reveal interesting properties with rich redox chemistry, receiving significant attention in battery applications. Thus, this review provides a detailed overview of recent developments in the effective use of vanadate-based materials for ESSs, covering primarily material design approaches and practical applications. Insights into technological advances and problems for ESSs are also presented with a focus on vanadate-based electrodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available