4.5 Review

Biomaterial strategies to replicate gynecological tissue

Journal

BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 1117-1134

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0bm01240h

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Women's health is an important but understudied area, where tissue engineering has the potential to revolutionize research by developing in vitro models of healthy and diseased tissues. By exploring the extracellular matrix, cell organization, and soluble factors within tissues, suitable biomaterials, cell types, and stimuli for building these models can be identified.
Women's health is an important and understudied area of research. The current standard of care for many gynecological diseases such as cancer or autoimmune-linked disorders such as endometriosis is surgery; however, the underlying mechanisms of action of many gynecological diseases are poorly understood. The field of tissue engineering has the potential to transform the field of women's health by developing in vitro models of healthy and diseased tissue that could be used to identify novel treatment strategies as well as gain a better understanding of complex signaling dynamics. Identification of the appropriate biomaterials, cell types, and stimuli (the tissue engineering triad) needed to build these in vitro models can be gleaned by interrogating the underlying extracellular matrix, cell organization, and soluble factors present in the tissue. In this review, we provide a general overview of the biology and components of the major tissues that make up the female reproductive system (ovaries, fallopian tubes, the uterus, and cervix) as well as a comprehensive survey of the different biomaterials that have been chosen to build in vitro models of these tissues. Furthermore, for each tissue, we recommend guiding principles in the design of in vitro models and discuss their potential to be used in drug screening and mechanistic studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available