3.8 Article

An Ethnographic Study of the Moral Experiences of Children with Cancer in New Delhi, India

Journal

GLOBAL QUALITATIVE NURSING RESEARCH
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2333393621995814

Keywords

childhood cancer; decision making; ethics; qualitative research; India

Categories

Funding

  1. Mitacs Globalink Research Award [IT07976]
  2. Global and Indigenous Health Nursing Travel Award
  3. McGill University Travel Bursary
  4. Mitacs Master's Award for Outstanding Innovation
  5. Fonds de recherche Quebec-Sante (FRQ-S)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focused on the moral experiences of children with cancer in India and found that children's participation in their treatment processes can be influenced by various factors, some facilitating and some impeding participation. The results provide valuable insights for healthcare professionals, policymakers, and families.
There is a paucity of research examining children's experiences with cancer in India. Childhood ethics is an emerging field, focusing on the moral dimension of children's experiences, to promote children's participation in their health care. A focused ethnography, using a moral experience framework, was conducted to better understand children's participation in decisions, discussions, and actions in three oncology settings in New Delhi, India. We interviewed key informants, retrieved key documents, and conducted semi-structured interviews and participant observations with children. All 22 children demonstrated interest in varying aspects of their cancer care. Certain factors facilitated or impeded their participation. Some children became distressed when they lacked information about their treatment or were not given opportunities to enhance their understanding. The results advance our understanding of the moral experiences of children with cancer in India for healthcare professionals, policy makers, families, and interested others.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available